[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Apr 4 14:44:26 CEST 2005
Hi, On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:13:20PM +0200, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote: > I guess that it may make sense to define a time frame here... i mean, > an organization planning to provide IPv6 connectivity in 20 years would > qualify here? Yes. But how much harm can it do? This organization would eat up about 1/4294967296 of the address space, and pay a yearly fee to RIPE to be permitted to keep it. Sounds like a fair deal to me. If the address space is allocated and doesn't even end up in the routing tables, even better. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]