[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Apr 4 14:42:12 CEST 2005
Hi, On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:10:15PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: > This I am not so sure about. Fixing the assignment size on /48 makes the > structure of address allocations and assignments very clear, but I am not > sure if we should make this official policy or just a recommendation. I > don't see a problem with assigning a /48 to a customer, but maybe this > should be the decision of the LIR... We're not making this policy, this *is* policy - same document, 5.4.1, and I do not see any proposal to change this. So please don't intermix "initial allocation criteria" (5.1.1) with "end user assignment sizes" (5.4.1) - and *please* don't change 5.4.1 or RFC3177. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]