[address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Fri Oct 29 07:41:02 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-10-29, at 06.50, Jeff Williams wrote: > > Thanks for your explanation. So I guess this means two different > policies because Afnic in this case "requested" such? No. RIPE members brought this to the address-policy WG that discussed this and agreed on it. > Interesting > method of policy determination.. Why? This is how all address-policy is determined. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQYHX9KarNKXTPFCVEQI/TwCgnxQ84L4OzisqnaMmfKmGjQ2GrvsAoJiG 1XV3UNYgYg7okusqfoa8vIdd =fY3J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]