[address-policy-wg] Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Masataka Ohta
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Tue Jun 22 17:01:54 CEST 2004
Kurt Erik Lindqvist; >>Application may use UDP with its own timeout. > So all UDP applications need to modified (or not used at multihomed > sites)? If there is a family of UDP applications sharing the same idea on "connection", there can be a set of connection management library functions shared by the applications. Then, it may be that only the library may be modified. > This is a discussion that doesn't belong here, but it's not the role of > the WG chairs to control the WG. Then, it was your mistake that you controlled the WG to forbid presentations of proposals. > Make a bidding round for the TLI roles? So you want an open market for > default-free address space? Read the draft for an example. It does not say "open". > So Yahoo would qualify as a TLI? If they won a TLI assignment in the > bidding round? While for example NTT might not? Read the draft. >>I do recognize the policies and says them orthogonal. > Well, the bidding for address space has a large chance to off-set the > financial models of the Internet today. As explained in my presentation, it does not. > Why would customers go to NLIs in the first place? I for one would only > by service from TLIs. It is you who are ignoring the reality. Why do customers today buy service from tier2 providers? Masataka Ohta
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]