[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
ripe-lst at eirconnect.net
Tue Jun 22 13:23:50 CEST 2004
Hi Gert, all, On Tuesday 22 June 2004 07:45, Gert Doering wrote: > As of today, "more-specific BGP multihoming" works. So he *can* set > his own routing policy. It's certainly a work-around if all else fails. I'm not sure it should be *encouraged* though, since announcing more-specific routes flies in the face of aggregation. Besides, don't most people filter on allocation boundaries? rgds, Sascha Luck -- DDO Eirconnect
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]