[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Morgado
chbm at cprm.net
Tue Jun 22 12:08:09 CEST 2004
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:45:29AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 07:44:23AM +0200, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > > > If you estimate that you will continue to be very small, you could use > > > a /40 or such from one of your upstream ISPs (which is a problem > > > *today*, > > > as there are not enough upstream ISPs, indeed). > > > > This doesn't fly. He can't set his own routing policy and he can't > > multihome. If he changes the single upstream his customers needs to > > renumber. > > As of today, "more-specific BGP multihoming" works. So he *can* set > his own routing policy. > Can you personaly garantee the upstream suplying the space won't aggregate his prefix ? If you can't this just turned a nice IPv6 space rental setup. -- Carlos Morgado <chbm at cprm.net> - Internet Engineering - Phone +351 214146594 GPG key: 0x75E451E2 FP: B98B 222B F276 18C0 266B 599D 93A1 A3FB 75E4 51E2 The views expressed above do not bind my employer.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]