[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pekka Savola
pekkas at netcore.fi
Tue Jun 22 06:47:33 CEST 2004
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Daniel Roesen wrote: > Even if a technical solution comes out of the multi6 WG, I have some > serious doubts that the "internet core" will implement/support it, as > it is against their essential commercial interests. And I totally agree > with Oliver Bartels and others who proclaim that IPv6 won't take > off until the enterprise multihoming issue is solved. Looks like the > cat is biting it's tail... Which is why the solution will likely be such that it's transparent to the "internet core". -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]