[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Morgado
chbm at cprm.net
Mon Jun 21 11:58:28 CEST 2004
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:41:05PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: > > If we still agree that we don't want to give /32's to enterprises, toy > ISPs without any real number of customers (hey! my consulting company > has two connectivity customers as well, should I get a /32 prefix?), > or such, we have to keep in some checks. > Have we figured out how to make multihoming work without giving multihomed networks their own prefix like in v4 ? -- Carlos Morgado <chbm at cprm.net> - Internet Engineering - Phone +351 214146594 GPG key: 0x75E451E2 FP: B98B 222B F276 18C0 266B 599D 93A1 A3FB 75E4 51E2 The views expressed above do not bind my employer.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]