[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Fri Jun 18 21:13:24 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-06-17, at 22.05, Randy Bush wrote: >> *I* always thought the primary goal was to get IPv6 deployed... > > i would think that the primary goal was to move the customers' > packets. if they want us to move ipv6, them it's moving ipv6. > we are concerned that it is deployABLE, because customers may > want it. > > but our job is not to get ipv6 deployed. Good point. If it where, people might realize that we forgot a bunch of stuff in IPv6. Such as multihoming...:-) But, I *think* that Gerts point was that our job is to make it as easy as possible to prepare for when (if) customers want IPv6. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQNM+1qarNKXTPFCVEQLuoQCfYPlzoEQdi67Luz5CzCjoE948RKwAoIGH EglO6L5tXz6ei1XKAGle2SGO =HnZO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]