[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"

>                                     We do not want to assign a /48 to all
>our customers only to meet RIPE's criteria.
>
>We prefer using only a /32 for each of our broadband access server, and /48
>only for customers asking for it (ie : customers who have a router, several
>subnets, ...).

  First of all, I think you got the prefix length stuff mixed up altogether
  (/32 for each access server?! :-)

  But more importantly, why do you intend to continue with the "address
  space scarcity" paradigm towards your customers?

  This sounds very much like an attempt to carry over the (broken)
  v4-business model for services into the v6 world, like

  - "you want a permanent address?" - well, this i not available in this
    package because the NCC forces us to do dynamic address management" or

  - "more than one permanent address?" - well, unfortunately this is not
    possible for this end-user package, you have to go for a business
    service which gives you 4/8/16 addresses, but unfortunately you _also_
    have to subscribe to a bigger bandwith" at the same time,...

>Bertrand Maujean

  Wilfried.