[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"

Hello,

we face the same problem. We are a small internet access provider in France.
We provide internet in residential areas, and our customers currently use
less than one IPv4 address per home. We do not want to assign a /48 to all
our customers only to meet RIPE's criteria.

We prefer using only a /32 for each of our broadband access server, and /48
only for customers asking for it (ie : customers who have a router, several
subnets, ...).

Bertrand Maujean



Jon Lawrence a écrit :

> On Thursday 17 June 2004 10:20, Pekka Savola wrote:
> >
> > I saw that -- but I don't see *any* justification for this
> > interpretation.  Remember, the goal is to require 200 assignments to
> > *other* organizations, not be satisfied that you can make 200
> > assignemnts to your internal network, or 100 assignments to your
> > internal network and 100 to other organizations!
>
> And this is part of the problem.
> We won't be rolling IPv6 out ot 200 customers any time soon.
> So we can't get an allocation. Thus we can't run trials with IPv6.
> I really fail to see the reason behind the 200 other organisation rule -
> perhaps somee one would like to explain the logic.
>
> Jon

--
Bertrand Maujean, responsable Informatique & Telecoms
SEM Cable de l'Est - www.semnet.tm.fr
254 rue de la gare, 54710 Ludres - 03 83 25 97 82