[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Thu Jun 17 09:59:46 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Because the original text required that the assignments are made to > the *other* organizations. By all logic, only the assignments to the > others should count. > > In any case, your own infrastructure shouldn't take more than a /48 or > something like that, so it wouldn't be useful to count it either: 199 > or 200 makes no difference -- this would become bad if you could just > assign e.g. /38 to your own infrastructure and state you've > already assigned worth of 200 /48's. See the email from Amar. Also, if you have several operating companies you might want to have separate assignments for each of them. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQNFPdqarNKXTPFCVEQKQFQCfb5RaQrTHk8tX+eBRTa7sRuRwJ/wAnipW 4D9dXvdbynovbsdHahJjB3ye =Wihj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]