[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Thu Jun 17 09:58:21 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-06-16, at 12.02, amar at telia.net wrote: > > >> Why not? If I have a large infrastructure, or is in the start-up phase >> or going through a network merger etc. I might have a lot of internal >> infrastructure but not many customer allocations. I fail to see why we >> would not include own allocations as those will be coming out of your >> block anyway. > > The policy states that You can assign a /48 per POP - lets say > a "broadband POP". If that should include the users asignments > or not is not defined. Right. And I am arguing that those /48s should be included in the 200 limit. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQNFPIaarNKXTPFCVEQI/lgCg2AMfFbKbRljx9vJGfBdzf7/zNsQAn2rq B0DIIaq+XYHNPoc9ATyFXN4K =FFGL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]