[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "c)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "c)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "c)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Wed Jun 16 02:10:20 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-06-15, at 17.36, Laura Cobley wrote: > Below is an excerpt from the IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment > Policy: > > 5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria "c)" > > "To qualify for an initial allocation of IPv6 address space, an > organisation must [...] plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to > organisations to which it will assign /48s by advertising that > connectivity through its single aggregated address allocation" > > > LIRs who operate closed/private networks appear not to qualify because > the address space in these networks will not be advertised. Was this > the > community's intention? More or less yes. If they do not plan to advertise this space, they should go for the "unique-site-local-replacement-addresses-that-you-are-not-allowed-to- route-globally-ever" (or whatever they will be called). - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQM+P8KarNKXTPFCVEQLCNQCfXZjr5+dl0X/Yi37xYlM0fs7SVdAAoN/0 dDnfaTnpuWSwxIx39mYLseek =YS11 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "c)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "c)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]