[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Wed Jun 16 01:43:42 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-06-14, at 11.34, Pekka Savola wrote: > >> - RECIPIENT OF ASSIGNMENTS >> >> -- The LIR has to have a plan to make these 200 assignments to >> 200 separate organisations (regardless of which >> organisation). Possible scenario: LIR can make 1 assignment >> to its own organisation and 199 assignments to 199 >> "different" organisations. > > No, your own allocations are not counted. Why not? If I have a large infrastructure, or is in the start-up phase or going through a network merger etc. I might have a lot of internal infrastructure but not many customer allocations. I fail to see why we would not include own allocations as those will be coming out of your block anyway. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQM+JtqarNKXTPFCVEQLPNwCdGUPO5YA3T6ZVY6OgdB9WpniemSgAoI1M nH85IqerKGd7H23Ge+ZMGBY2 =Hhkp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]