[address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Jun 15 17:08:00 CEST 2004
> Hm, it's not "the UDP packet size limit", it is "the packet size limit > for DNS over UDP without the application of EDNS.0". I may not have > followed things too closely, but it makes me sort of wonder why a push > towards EDNS.0 is not being advocated instead of polluting the routing > space to compensate for people who have not yet upgraded their > software. bingo! we seem to be pushing address space sales at the expense of routing/conservation, with no real justification. but folk have been ignoring me on this for years; so i'll go back to sleep now. > Of course, people may still dream up configurations which > would exceed the EDNS.0 DNS over UDP packet size limit. and they will, just to be silly and grab a /24 randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]