This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Wed Jun 9 14:51:29 CEST 2004
Hi Andreas!
>I have don't think that this should be an imperative. Do you really think
>that LIRs should not be able to request such an allocation on behalf of
>a customer that would like to do that?
Sorry, my question was meant "the-other-way-'round":
that a request has to come by way of an established LIR "in good
standing" (this of course includes "friendly" existing LIRs offering
the service for the project :-). I just wanted to be sure that we don't
open a by-pass channel to the LIR structure.
>If someone finds it cumbersome to renumber because he has to return the
>resources granted to do dns anycasting he probably should not apply for
>this resource ;-)
Well, the picture might be a bit more complex, in particular for TLDs,
when they have to "please" the IANA and/or ICANN to get a re-delegation
at a certain point in time ;-)
And I haven't yet thought to the bottom of how thing would look like if
this becomes a service for supporting many zones, and all of them have
to be renumbered because of an interaction with this "special assignment
requirement"...
>Cheers
>Andreas
Cheers/Servus,
Wilfried.
PS: and slightly off-topic:
I honestly dislike special arrangements in general - when they are
meant to punch holes into too restrictive general resource management
rules. We have built too many cans of worms in the past doing so...
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]