[address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joao Damas
Joao_Damas at isc.org
Fri Jun 11 10:53:39 CEST 2004
On 11 Jun, 2004, at 10:50, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 10:47:23AM +0200, Joao Damas wrote: >> Don't you think the policy ought to be more relaxed and allow the >> server manager for the zone to decide how many of their servers they >> want to anycast? > > This is not my decision. It's up to the working group to decide on the > policy they want to have. That's why I was asking for your opinion. > > The current proposal is a somewhat-balanced compromise, but in no way > cast in stone (yet :) ). It also appears to be under the shadow of the conservation syndrome as this seems to be the only justification to limit the usage of an RFC documented operational procedure. Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]