[hm-staff] RE: [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Next message (by thread): [hm-staff] RE: [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Anne Lord
anne at apnic.net
Thu Jan 15 00:52:13 CET 2004
Hans Petter, No-one from the APNIC Secretariat has made any comments about the proposed policy. The reference to APNIC occurred in a sentence by Jeff Williams. Things got a bit confused from thereon.. Anne APNIC Secretariat ---------------------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Hans Petter Holen wrote: > Could somebody summarize what the APNIC objections to changed policy are ? > > -hph > > |> So if we send out a formal proposal to change RIPE things to RIPE > |> lists, and nobody from the RIPE community objects - what's > |wrong with > |> assuming consensus, then? > | > |maybe because we have not yet implemented that packets and > |routing information stay only within the ripe region? it's > |the global internet we're affecting. > | > |think locally, act globally > | -- motto of the small view polluter > | > |randy > | > > _______________________________________________ > Hostmaster-staff mailing list > Hostmaster-staff at apnic.net > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/hostmaster-staff >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Next message (by thread): [hm-staff] RE: [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]