[address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Jan 14 17:46:56 CET 2004
> So please: constructive criticism is welcome, but things like > "all that you do is wrong, because APNIC is doing something!" > (and no further reason or detail given) are just wasting our > time. excuse! where did i say that? please do not put stupid words into my keyboard, i do that well enough. i merely responded to what i considered an unwise statement which sets an incorrect atmosphere and could become a quoted precident set by a co-chair of this wg. >>> So if we send out a formal proposal to change RIPE things to >>> RIPE lists, and nobody from the RIPE community objects - what's >>> wrong with assuming consensus, then? i still consider this unwise, and for the reasons i stated. and, in the face of such statements, i do not consider pointing out that we are making, or proposing to make, policy that affects the global internet a waste of time. if you feel it wastes yours, you have a delete key. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]