[address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Mon Jan 12 22:17:39 CET 2004
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:47:27PM +0100, Hans Petter Holen wrote: > --On 12. januar 2004 10:23 +0100 Daniel Karrenberg > <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote: > > This discussion is *not* about address policy, > > it really is about ** routing policy! ** > > This is actually a very good point, I personally support this view. So we should discuss things in routing-wg, and if we come to the conclusion that we like to see some special IP block to make "special" anycast assignments from, come back to address-policy-wg, right? Regards, Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]