[address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Previous message (by thread): Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Thu Jan 8 11:04:33 CET 2004
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:32:42PM +0100, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote a message of 29 lines which said: > (This is not contradicting myself, I want to point out. The network > of the DENIC "office" is not special - but the name servers are. > The more, the better, and there is no way to do anycasting without > an additional routing table entry). Therefore we agree. What if DENIC changes its proposal to "critical resource *and* using anycasting"?
- Previous message (by thread): Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]