[address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Jan 8 11:19:35 CET 2004
Hi, On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:18:39AM +0000, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote: > >That's why I'm in favour to have a policy that permits allocations for > >specific, well-defined Anycast services. That allocations would come > >from a well-known block, so people would know to not filter /24s from > >there (and so on). > > I agree that there should be a specific and well-defined policy. But I > think that this policy does not need to be restricted to anycast services. We don't *want* a "everybody that doesn't like the current policy can just get addresses under the execptional policy"-policy. A specific problem needs solving. Besides this, the current policy works well. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 57882 (57753) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]