[address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allowallocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jan 7 20:42:08 CET 2004
Hi, On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 08:14:12PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Gert Doering wrote: > > I would be happy to sacrifice one routing table entry per ccTLD, though, > > if it increases reliability of the whole DNS system. Speaking for my > > network only, of course. > > .. until someone figures out that, hey, each ccTLD actually requires > more entries (e.g., 3), because having just one prefix for all the > servers increases the danger/threat of a routing system hiccup for a > prefix.. Those entries would be for the anycast servers. There's nothing wrong with having 8 other servers hosted at some ISPs, happily using PA addresses out of the corresponding ISP's PA space, and not needing a single routing table entry. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 57882 (57753) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allowallocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]