[address-policy-wg] Re: Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Fri Aug 20 14:43:24 CEST 2004
>Well, clearly ICANN and the U.S. watch the IANA because the IANA >an activity which the DOC subcontracts to ICANN to perform. Exactly. > The IANA is not an organization and it has no independent status. It >just happens to be the historical name for some of the functions of ICANN Exactly. >so for convenience and clarity, the name remains assigned to that set of >functions. For clarification read this contract that ICANN has signed with >the DOC on behalf of the U.S. Government. Indeed. And given the world, some governments, and ICANN as they are these days, I (personally) do not consider that structure to be the most stable and resilient setup that I'd rather have in place to control global resource distribution. Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]