[address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jon Lawrence
jon at lawrence.org.uk
Wed Aug 11 11:59:17 CEST 2004
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 09:18, Randy Bush wrote: > > It would make sense (to me anyway) that once xx% of a /12 is > > allocated then another /12 is issued to the RIR. > > withholding judgement of the wisdom of a /12, and just using it > as an example. it would seem sensible that the xx% be 100% > less the expected burn rate for the time it takes to allocate a > new block, plus some fudge. i.e. if iana can allocate in a > week, then 90% would seem reasonable. if it takes the iana a > year, then a much smaller percentile. > > and before we start throwing stones at the iana, it would be > interesting to actually know the mean and variance of queue > times of the iana and the various rirs over the last decade. > my personal experience would not suggest that anyone could > be particularly proud. > > randy Those figures would probably be useful and would seem a sensible way of deciding the % which must be allocated before a new block was issued. Rather than a /12 perhaps it ought to be that the RIR's apply to iana for a block of /x size. With /x being expected to last the RIR iro 36 months. Jon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]