[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Aug 10 17:48:48 CEST 2004
> Repeat the mistakes done in IPv4, only this time by assigning everything to > the RIRs instead of directly to the user? Good plan. Has nobody learned from > the mistaked made in the past? > > We can not say if there will be another assigment policy then IANA->RIR->LIR > in maybe 20 or 30 years (thats the time IPv6 has a realistic chance to gain > real speed). > > Then the RIRs sit on their /8s wihtout really needing it just like the > organizations that got direct assignments today. bingo! and i do not buy the assumption that the rirs need no oversight, just as i do not buy that the iana does. and i do not buy that these policy fora mailing lists provide that oversight any more than i buy that the equivalent ones in icann provide the same for the iana. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]