[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Tue Aug 10 15:40:48 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 05:38:03PM +0200, leo vegoda wrote: >> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ipv6.html > > Very reasonable draft. > > - starting with a /12 is "big enough" for the near future (there are > a couple of /20 allocation requests in the pipeline, but a /12 can > fulfill 128 of them before reaching 50%) > > - adding individual bits, growing into the /6, ensures that the stuff > stays aggregateable-by-region Agree. And this also more or less reflects the discussions we have had at least in the RIPE region. > Personally, I would tend to start with /8s (instead of /12s), but I > know > that this is way too radical for the conservative minds out there. > Based > on that, a /12 is a reasonable compromise. I don't think that starting with /8s would give much more benefit. What is not needed is strict and good assignment algorithms inside the RIRs. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQRjQZKarNKXTPFCVEQLx3ACeLTE839wgtEVLeTcpe66mTDUTx/wAn1ym upsVmawRGsPvRgQTHNQ5Myd/ =DG57 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]