[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Aug 10 13:19:51 CEST 2004
Hi, On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 12:03:08PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 10-aug-04, at 11:31, Gert Doering wrote: > > >The important thing about the "/6 approach" is that the initial /12s > >(growing to /8s) are allocated with so much room in between that you > >*can* grow to a /7 or /6, if necessary, and don't have to start a > >second (or even more) block per RIR. > > Why is that important? Because you want to avoid fragmentation. Please read up the RIPE-161 thread in the mailing list archives. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 65398 (60210) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]