[address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Is the time for conservation over?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Bicknell
bicknell at ufp.org
Tue Oct 28 20:04:52 CET 2003
In a message written on Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:50:10PM -0800, Jeff Williams wrote: > I also am in agreement with Leo on this point as well. IPv8 is already > in significant deployment asia and elsewhere and is in some folks > opinion, though I am sure not Michael's, a superior IP Protocol to > IPv6, which has known Privacy problems. This was already brought up on PPML, but since another list is copied here I'll say it again. I had _NO_ idea there was an IPv8 proposal out there. I know nothing about it, don't support it, and don't care. s/IPv8/IPvFuture/ in my message please, that was my only intention. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20031028/cc753d1b/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]