[ppml] Re: [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] Re: [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeff Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Tue Oct 28 21:51:49 CET 2003
David and all, David Conrad wrote: > Hi, > > >>> It's not scarce and the vast majority of IPv4 LIRs will > >>> be deploying IPv6 sometime. So why don't we just give every single > >>> one of them an IPv6 /32 today. Instead of creating barriers to the > >>> adoption > > The obvious implication of this is that it pretty much guarantees the > creation of a new and potentially much bigger swamp. Hi David! I agree here. > > > I'll leave it to others to determine if that is a serious concern. > > Rgds, > -drc Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!) "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" - Pierre Abelard =============================================================== CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] Re: [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]