This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Request Forms: updated and available on LIR Portal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Request Forms: updated and available on LIR Portal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Request Forms: updated and available on LIR Portal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Lenz
slz at baycix.de
Thu Aug 28 13:18:59 CEST 2003
Hay, On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:51:31PM +0200, Hans Petter Holen wrote: > > BUT... information like the equipment being used or a network > > plan or so _must_ be optional information, not _required_ information. > > It can't be that a company is _required_ to make statements about > > their network and equipment if they want to have IP-Adresses! > > (and no, RIPE doesn't always qualify for receiving such information). > > This indeed an interesting point of view. It has been the practice for as > long as I can remember for the RIPE NCC to ask for documnetation for the > need for IP addresses. > > Is there strong support in the community to remove this cirteria ? Don't get me wrong. I'm talking about a special case here, respectively about detailed information as in "equipment specs, model number...ect." as well as stuff like "network plans". If some company doesn't want to reveal such information, there's not legal way to force them to do. If one does, there is certainly another ISP with an AW big enough who gets the customer the IP adresses he needs without asking such detailed information, regardless what RIPE wants (that's just the real world situation nowerdays). What i'm not talking abut is general information about the network like "we have 5 PCs, 7 servers with 10 Interfaces and two routers with 5 Interfaces and a fridge with ethernet" or so. That's needed information as always. But say if some company doesn't want to tell what product they use for whatever, VPN dialin and they only say "we have 120 dialin lines for our employees" that has to be enough. It doesn't matter if that's a Cisco or a Bintec or whatever anyways. I've seen such information being confidental in the eyes of security managers. Let alone sending bills of the equipment or so to RIPE as verfication. > If not, how should the LIR/RIR verify this criteria ? How does a LIR verify this today? You go to every customer and let you show everything? -- ========================================================================== = Sascha 'master' Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de = = NOC BayCIX GmbH = = http://www.noc.baycix.de/ * PGP public Key on demand * = ==========================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Request Forms: updated and available on LIR Portal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Request Forms: updated and available on LIR Portal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]