[address-policy-wg] Draft agenda Address Policy Working Group RIPE 46
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft agenda Address Policy Working Group RIPE 46
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft agenda Address Policy Working Group RIPE 46
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Tue Aug 19 22:23:59 CEST 2003
>> thanks for the numbers. How about the rest of the information >> requested? > > You wanted some information on the background, types of PI requests > and other things. > > We don't keep statistics on the motivation for a request for PI > address space. In fact, we don't ask for it in most cases. We just > make sure that the requester is aware of the issues that come with > small blocks of address space and any possible alternatives to PI > address space. > > However, we do keep statistics on the stated use the address space > will be put to. However, the majority of PI assignments we make will > be used for more than one purpose. In these cases it is often > impossible to label an assignment with a single category. Instead, we > label it as "Miscellaneous". > > This year, the "Miscellaneous" category has been appropriate in about > 69% of assignments. Another 19% were for office LANs. We also had 4% > used for server hosting, 3% for broadband services, about 1% for P2P > links and about 1% for GPRS services. > From what I remember of what you said in Barcelona, the absolute numbers of PI space assigned is really low though, right? - kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft agenda Address Policy Working Group RIPE 46
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft agenda Address Policy Working Group RIPE 46
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]