[address-policy-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Aug 13 17:26:32 CEST 2003
Hi, On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 04:12:36PM +0200, Sebastian Abt wrote: > > > A range of IP's can only have a single "SUB-ALLOCATED PA" in it. > > > That is, you cannot sub-allocate twice. > > > > I wouldn't force that on anyone. It might not always make sense, but > > we have at least one reseller that has a re-selling customer - so a > > two-level structure is already in place. > > > > So "please don't do that". > > I disagree. Your customer should request a seperate "SUB-ALLOCATED PA" > block for his customer or otherwise if he want's to look like being > independent to his customer, he should become RIPE member. I hardly > can't see advantages of making sub-sub-allocations (maybe you could > point them out?). It's their suballocation, and their customer, not mine - how can I judge how big *their* customer is going to be, and how much address space they want? The whole point of suballocation is "give control to the people that actually hand out the addresses" - flexibility, instead of buerocracy. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 56535 (56318) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]