[address-policy-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Aug 13 15:12:07 CEST 2003
Hi, On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:08:57PM +0200, Shane Kerr wrote: > In the meantime, we do not want to delay the implementation of the > Sub-Allocation policy. For that reason we'd like to have an interim > status attribute value for that. I like that. > Proposal: > > Add "SUB-ALLOCATED PA" to the allowed "status:" values. That would be in agreement with the original proposal, so "I like that" (obviously). > "SUB-ALLOCATED PA" inetnum object may have an "ALLOCATED PA" or an > "LIR-PARTITIONED PA" less specific inetnum object. > > A range of IP's can only have a single "SUB-ALLOCATED PA" in it. That > is, you cannot sub-allocate twice. I wouldn't force that on anyone. It might not always make sense, but we have at least one reseller that has a re-selling customer - so a two-level structure is already in place. So "please don't do that". Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 56535 (56318) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]