[address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
Hank Nussbacher hank at att.net.il
Wed Aug 13 08:48:41 CEST 2003
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Peter Galbavy wrote: > Stephen Burley wrote: > > 1.registry services (good and timely) > > 2. database repository (and related DB functions) > > 3. Training services (mainly for new LIR's to get them up to speed) > > 4. RIPE meeting organization > > I agree with 1-3. I think 4 should be a "spare time" activity or one > organised by an EU Internet "club". If 4 can be done part time by *one* > person, then I am happy to pay for my part of the time. i agree with 1+2+4. 3 should be covered on a cost basis by the attendees. if the cost of a training session is 5000euro (room, lunch, instructor time, etc) and 25 attend, then the cost should be 200euro per attendee, with no affect on the overall ncc budget. > > Peter > Hank Nussbacher