[address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hans Petter Holen
hpholen at tiscali.no
Wed Aug 13 00:21:14 CEST 2003
| > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:00:02AM +0100, > Carlos Friacas <cfriacas at fccn.pt> wrote > a message of 29 lines which said: > > > > If all non-US-ccTLD registries (of which there are lots more than > > > US-based) start beating ICANN with joint forces, I'm pretty sure that > > > this will have an effect. > > > > Has anyone tried serious reasoning with them about these delays??? I have raised the question to the ASO address council and ICANN coordination list. I'll get back to the WG with the response and we can discuss a constructive approach to solve this. Hans Petter Holen RIPE Address Policy chair / ICANN ASO Address Council co-chair. > Good Lord, on which planet were you, the last five years? All the > ccTLD managers, as well as many governments, a lof of concerned > individuals and so on, have tried to move IANA faster. If it does not, > it is not a technical issue (unlike ".com" or even ".fr", the root is > a very small zone, easily maintainable manually), it is a political > one. > > IANA blackmails the ccTLD managers: if they do not sign the > "sponsorship agreement" (not one in Europe did), even very trivial > changes are delayed for ever. >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]