This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Mon Aug 11 23:06:49 CEST 2003
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 08:52:45PM -0100, Hans Petter Holen <hpholen at tiscali.no> wrote a message of 13 lines which said: > * beating I didn't. > * calling eachother names (its ICANN not "Uncle Sam" Yes, it is the same thing. Read www.icann.org and specially the parts about the various contracts with DoC (US Department of Commerce) which approves, in writing, every change in the root zone file. > * discussing ICANN ccTLD operational matters in the RIPE address > policy WG. I didn't want to discuss ICANN matters. On the contrary, I wanted to emphasize that ICANN practices are a fixed feature, like gravity, and therefore we should design policies that take this feature into account (if policies are meant to solve real-world problems, that is, and not just to be "elegant").
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]