[address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Aug 11 17:14:49 CEST 2003
Hi, On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:18:31AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > > As far as I understand, the threat from APNIC and RIPE to just ditch > > ICANN and get on without it seems to have had quite some effect. > > > > If all non-US-ccTLD registries (of which there are lots more than > > US-based) start beating ICANN with joint forces, I'm pretty sure that > > this will have an effect. > > and why should they trust ripe and apnic more than icann? all act > from positions of power while claiming service. I was just argueing that "the internet will work fine without ICANN, so maybe they should actually start being productive for the money they burn". Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 56535 (56318) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]