[address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Aug 11 11:50:59 CEST 2003
Hi, On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:48:28AM +0200, Joao Luis Silva Damas wrote: > I have one question, trying to understand the main goal of the exercise: > > * Is the aim of the a new PI policy to adjust the policy to the > requests and needs of the industry or is it a way of getting a "special > allocation" policy by another name? My aim is to adjust the policy (actually both PA and PI policy) to match observed need. People are requesting *multiple* PI blocks because they can't get a PA allocation, and that seems to be just wrong to me. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 56535 (56318) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]