[acm-tf] Determining a sanction is the primary issue

It depends - at least some activists (and blocklists) have tried to
use RIPE processes properly.

And on the other hand there are some entitites that follow the RIPE
processes in letter though definitely not in spirit, to get themselves
lots of /15s.

Can we please not go down this blame game path?

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
<Woeber at cc.univie.ac.at> wrote:
>
> I may add here, that some of those self-appointed vigilantes have themselves
> tried already to use mechanisms to "force" other entities by applying pressure
> mechanisms that would render them "guilty" in general terms. There is a good
> reason whay at least one of those organisations has already been taken to court
> for that, and has been publicly shamed for their activities and "reasoning".
>
> The last thing I would like to see is the RIPE NCC becoming one of "those"
> organisations, too. As bad as some stuff on the Internet is (I am well aware
> of that fact[1]) the stability and impartiality of the RIPE NCC is by far more
> important, imho.



-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)