About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
EIX Working Group
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
RIPE Meeting Minutes
RIPE Meeting Presentations
Wish List v 3.0
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Minutes from RIPE 37

RIPE Meeting: 37
Working Group: European Internet Exchange Working Group (EIX)
Status: Final
Revision Number: 1

Please mail comments/suggestions on:

Chair:	Fearghas McKay

Scribe:	David Knight 

Agenda: No changes to the proposed agenda

Internet Exchange Reports:

INEX:

	Internet Neutral Exchange
	Alex Fench (Via Networks) 

Founded 96, operational 97

Founder members:

	eunet ireland
	heanet
	indigo
	telecom internet

All members share operational tasks and nominate one board member,
hence no operational staff ... 3 honorary staff. Chairman Mike Norris.

Current Members:

	11

Eligibility:

	isps only
	must have independent route to mae east
	must be rir member

Fees:

	635 eu joining
	2857 eu annual (for 2000)

Facilities:

	two racks in a colo
	two cisco switches, ups, generator, model is byob
	acces is digi leased lines, sdh, atm

Traffic stats:

	avg 5.5 Mbps
	peak 18 Mbps

	Douling 11 months
	Prefixes 162

Upgrade planned:

	tender for a new facility in progress
	carrier class location
	extra space for new members and bigger / more kit
	all the usual stuf of any IX

More info:

	www.inex.ie
	MoU
	App forms
	Tender docs ... for new facility
	INEX secretary: 

Questions:

Switches ?

	cisco 29??

New Location ?

	members will meet the costs of moving to the new location



AMSIX:

Since ripe36:

	Increase in members from 90 to 101
	Increase in routers 99 to 111

Peak traffic since ripe 36 1.6g to 2.4g

Housing:

	sara and nikhef are full
	nikhef expanded by 80 cabinets by dec2000

	will go to 2 new locations
	telecity 5000m2
	global switch (they are building 31,000m2 facility by Q4 2000)

In use:

	Foundry big iron, sara nikhef interconnected with 2 fibre pairs
	ordering 2 ig irons ...
	ipv6 ports deployd at normal rate, this will be provided as a
	regular service ...

Port charges (unchanged):

	10	500 eu p/m
	100	850 eu p/m
	1000	1200 eu p/m

Questions:

Who owns the fibre interconnects ?

	not amsix, amsix owns the kit which was donated
	amsix is the only manager of the switches
	rate is total summary of all isps who peer on the two switches
	they currently run a multicast test
	there is multicast mailing list, info on mcast tests on amsix site


LINX:

Mike Hughes     Network Architect

Organisationl changes:

	Keith Mitchell has resigned
	Rolan Perry has been appointed as interim ceo
	Nick Lewis left, this sparked a reorganisation in eng at Linx
	Mike and Chris Fletcher become project leaders ...
	Frees chris and mike from support for work on large high impact
	projects
	allows progression for other team members
	more clearly defined job focus

Traffic Levels:

	Recently broke the 3Gb barier
	Daily minimum is now over a gig
	www2.linx.net
	Rate is aggregate of all ports ... 8 switches are in service
	Reimplimentation of stats system ... mrtg could no longer cope
	Chris implemented rrdtool
	Graphs and pages done on the fly with cgi ...

	current members - 110 / 50% from UK ... member from most
	eu countries

expansion sites:

	Expanding to 7 sites ... fibre is delaying things
	Local authority upset with amount of road dug up for fibre install
	London underground also in on the act, tubes sunk too close to the
	tunnels
	One site, redbus, live since feb
	IX europe lit an on test
	Guardian and interxion are almost ready, most linx kit is
	installed, just waiting for fibre
	Expanded into telehouse east building, equipped with foundry
	switches, this helps relieve a lot of stree on telehouse north
	which is very full
	First extreme black diamond I swith installed, very happy

new technology:

	Scalability of a flat layer two exchange point - will it
	hit a barrier ?
	Threat of a lack of intelligence
	Effective handling of multicast
	Main strength is the simplicity
	However this strenght could in future become a weakness ...
	Looking at possibilities of usin wdm
	Looking into packet ring study group ... turn cisco dpt into
	an ieee standard supporting gE an 10gE physical transports
	grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/rprsg/

Projects:

	Seperate mcast infrastructure
	17 members connected
	4 or 5 actually mcasting now
	Steve walker  organised a two day event in
	july, 40 attendees
	Workign with Cisco to develop a protool to contain mcast traffic
	in a layer 2 ennvironment
	Cisco havea loaned a catalyst  5500
	Trying to get other vendors involved
	90% of the kit connected to the exchange is cisco
	Mcast project expansion is planned
	They need to get people into using mcast, find that killer app
	Possiility of another mcast event in the future

	Working now with RIPE NCC on RIS project
	Route servers replaced by a RIS box
	www.ripe.net - ris site

	A Caida project to map the internet
	Caida skitter box installed, on the k-root lan
	Extreme switch at telecity replaced with a black diamond I
	Alcatel too low port density, foundry are smaller



SFINX:


Franck Simon - Tehnical Manager

Locations:

	La Bourse  	existing
	12eme		second
	Aubervilliers	newest

Current status:

	Interconnection of second sfinx pop, suffered from bad delays due
	to faulty kit

	Links are gig, using WDM

	All architecture is based on cisco catalyst switces

	4 switches, sfinx1 offers 10/100 others offer 1000

	Managed service

	Hosted service only also offered

	Managed service is no longer offered but still provide for those
	who already have it

	aubervilliers - 50 cabinets	10 carriers
	12eme		12 cabinets	3 carriers

	All the pops can be accesses 24/7 ...

	Transit not allowed and private peerings not allowed between
	isps on the sfinx

	Basic service comparable to standard ix service

	2nd dns via peering with afnic

	Router reset can be done by sfinx staff

	on sfinx all isps bar one come with cisco routers

New services: (only at the new pops)

	Stats

	Vlan service - possile for isps to dedicate bandwidth for speific
	peerings

	Route reflector  to simplify peerings

	Route server, routing table chek an comparison with RIPE db

	NTP service

	IPv6 peering with renater


Optional services:

	Extra 10/100
	Gig
	Mcast


Future:

	New pops will bring a big trafic increase, atm isp's ar not coming
	at capacity


Manager  	sabine.jaume@renater.fr
		franck.simon@renater.fr

Questions:

	Why don't you allow people to provide transit ?

		Want to remain a peering point
		If they see transit they have the right to disconect the
		isps involved

Is the no private connect rule not contrary to IX ?

		People wanting to do this must do it outside the sfinx room
		so they might have to put in two set of kit

		They get a room in a colo, they povide the switch, they
		pay a colo operator to manage the service


		They bill on the physical size of the router, hence you must
		be in the sfinx room to peer, if you are already in the colo
		you must also put a seperate router in the sfinx room



INXS:

Intro:

	Is a neutral exchainge point
	Oldest ixp in germany
	Established in munich in 94
	Operated by cable an wireless
	Open host policy - no restriction to carriers
	Isps may make inxs their pop in munic

Requirement:

	Have AS num, be a LIR, must house a router at inxs, switches
	and lan not allowed, no oligation to peer

Facilities:

	Standard 19" racks
	4 units per member
	4 units 500 DM / month
	Access control system
	Cisco catalysts are in use
	6 racks now, 6 more reserved


Support:

	24/7 phone supprt
	Router reset on request
	Physical check of conections
	24/7 access arrangeable
	Extended support by contract


Contact:

	http://www.inxs.de
	Members area

	mail lists:

		tech-l@inxs.de
		org-l@inxs.de

		archive available on http://www.inxs.de

Upstreams:

	cable and wireless
	ebone
	aucs - coming

Carriers:

	colt
	dtag
	m-net

	lines termintate in carrier room

Future services:

	Looking for a second switch
	No connect to exisiting, for independence
	No oligation to connect to second switch
	Multicast via dedicated switch by end of 2000
	Out of band access
	Isdn dialin or telnet by end of oct 2000
	Switch stats by end of oct 2000
	Testing ipv6 until Jan next year
	Only beta ios available with ipv6 support
	During test phase no fees
	Aditional racks for ipv6 routers at inxs
	Only regular inxs members may take part

Genereal:

	32 members
	Inxs moved from old ECRC facilities
	Distributed peering point has been established
	Redundant gig links
	22 members moved successfully
	5 to be moved until 21 sep


Information:

	www.inxs.de
	info@inxs.de


Questions:

	They will set up an mcast mailing list

	Private interconnects are okay




VIX:




Status:

	Individual peaks up to 90Mbps
	Stats worry them as they are where LINX was one year ago
	Perhaps this time ex year they will have the kind of traffic that
	linx has right now +3Gb

	Exchange is accessible only during ofice hours, outside
	office hours is best effort, no contracts available

	2 outages in the last 4 years, one hour power outage, . one 2 hour
	switch failure

	Various line carriers availabe ...


Near Future:

	Gig by q4 2000

	1st vix extension at interxion, neutral colo, expected to come
	on line within q4 2000

	Big problem is getting dark fibre in vienna for redundant multi
	gig trunk interconnect

	Improvement of service level, 24/7 service - improved redundancy

	Mcast environents will be driven by member interest and active
	participation - connections to a dedidcated fethernet hub,
	gets the feelin that the market is there now f mcast service.

	The national TV company wants to mcast


Requirements:

	Have own AS
	Be a LIR
	Internationl connectiity independant of existing members,
	prefixes and peerings registered in the ripe db


Charging:

	10 euro p/m 10t
	200 p/n 100bt

	charging model to be adapted, with new site ad gig


Questions:

	Apparently catalyst 59 doesn't cope too well with mcast on an
	exchange point

	Currently 3 are taking part in mcast tests, 2 more are interested
	no public announcement of tests yet, working currently with internal
	partner, most people just want to watch for the time being, this
	will open up soon, when there is experience and time, it is not
	currently announced, nobody is excluded, special requests can
	join in

	We announce peers to other peers in the db, randy wants to
	announce customers not peers, peers miht be private, you
	dont announce peers to other peers, but you always announce
	customers to your peers, so why not have that documented,
	why ?

	Vix peering matrix is no longer maintained by vix, each customer
	can maintain their own bit

	They were offerin newsfeecds for their pri customers unis, etc,
	newsfeeds suck up too much bandwidth these days. Vix reduced the
	feed back to the groups of academic value

	As they cannot deliver a full feed anymore they do not offer
	newsfeeds at all now



CERN CIXP:

	Paolo Maroni

	Exchange point for switzerland
	Colo'd with cern
	Non profit best effort

	basic fibre providers

		colt
		sig (electrical provide)
		mci worldom, sunrise, ...

	30 isps now members

	The recent trend is for global isps, less local ones

	CERN and other research nets are connected


Infrastructure:

	Cisco catalyst 4003, 5505
	10/100/1000 port available - most isps use 100
	Back to back links are allowed
	Extreme networks summit48 ordered

	Infrmal measurements show

		peaks between 100 - 200 Mb

		back to back traffic needs to be added to the global traffic

	Normal services of an IXP


	Best effort services:

	oob cables and lines

	24/7 operations

	Equipment install on request

	Kit maintenance - card install etc, on request

	www site - including bgp list of contacts

	Infrastructure monitoring


Isues:

	Staff unavailability
	Rack space - some requests have to be rejected
	Contact with isps - a more detailed install procedure would help
	Limited to cern until end of sep 2000
	A new non exclusive partnership with telehouse suisse
	Distribute infrastructure (Gig links) already there
	Security in telehouse much better
	Allows large pops connected directly to cixp


Development:

	New www site
	Split from cern external network
	Looking glass
	Mcast - some experiments on their own, so far only one request
	from a member, they want to get more confident with the technology
	before announcing it to the membership
	They would like to get better stats with mrtg, etc
	Content distro service, they are talking to people about
	hosting equipment
	Better coordination between cixp members
	Sec dns, ipv6 and a route server
	They have already ipv6 conectivity ...
	They have had one request for a route server ...

Contact:

	

	http://network.cern.ch/public/services/cixp/index.html


Informal nature o the cixp seems to be working well right now ...



-=-=-=--=-=-=-
END OF REPORTS
-=-=-=--=-=-=-



BEST CURRENT PRACTICE:


IXP-BCP  Whats happenin ?

	Nick Lewis offered to edit the document
	Working for LINX then, during ripe36

	Nick is now working for a commercial isp and does not envisage a
	conflict of interest, his current employer supports the internet
	community activity, he has done a lot of work analysing ixp's
	around europe and would like to share this knowledge with the
	community

	He is very keen to ontinue

	Does the group agree ?

		Yes

  	His point of view having come from an IXP to an ISP is appreciated

	Rapid pace of technology will make this doc old quick



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Suggestion to change the charter ...

Suggestion from Keith - change in the wording of the new EIX Charter


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Presentaion from I-Point Holdings

	A Way forward for European IXP's  -  Annette Nabavi


I-Point set up to enhance the inter-isp infrastructure in europe

Through consolidation and expansion they hope to achieve this

UK based holding compay, well backed by venture capital

Operating companies in each ountry

Want to work with all major exchange point where possible, will roll out
across eu within 12 months


They are not an isp, or a colo, or a telco, or an asp, or a trade
association


They will:


	Provide funding or growth
	Service and tehnology enhancements
	Consistency in all eu countries
	They beleive absolutely in neutrality
	Flexibility an fast response is vital skeleton staff model cannot
	last, they want to have a consistently well maintaind ix network
	throughout the EU
	Will work toward staff motivation and retention
	They want to ensure that service levels are maintained
	and inrcreased, evolution not revolution

	Neutrality is a key issue
	Will guarantee 3 independent colos in  metro area
	No exclusive arrangements
	Similar approach across europe

Management team includes:

	Annette Nabavi CEO
	Keith Mitchell CTO
	Richard Almeida
	Alex Bligh

Advisory Committee made up of IXP / internet gurus:

	Rob Blokzijl among others ..

Whats it all about:

	They want to aquire IXP's in the EU, if that is not possible
	they can look into setting up new indeendent IXP's ..
	They want to reassure that neutrality will continue ...
	They see benefits as funding for growth, one stop shopping
	service and techonology comes quicker, free of current
	governance model, minimum disruption to existing services.


Main Venture Capitalists:

	Nexus Equities
	Nexus investments
	GMT


Questions:


	Why the buyout model ?

		They believe its vital for customers to come directly to
		one company for services


	They will not provide conectivity between their exchange points


	They will roll out to eu countries (10ish) over the next 12 months

	The rules of current ix's seem to reflect the protectionism of the
	founder members investment

	If the company is bought out, they claim that a new owner would
	destroy the company by altering the neutrality position ergo
	the neutrality is assured

	They don't intend to exclude people, but how do you make bargain
	basement services ?

	Who's idea was this ?

		Keith Mitchell

	Existing ixps facing threats, colos threaten that if ixps don't
	work with them they will start operating as ixps themselves

	Its harder to stay ahead of the technology requirements with funding
	from current members

	The main problem is that every euro ix has a diferent service level,
	and level of information

	i-Point will fix this by standardising the eu ixp's

	Community cooperative doesn't work anymore

	Wih the cooperative omunity model there is not the same recourse for
	damages recovery

	Why a buyout model instead of a licensing model ?

		Its important that they can guarantee a fast responsive
		service.
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community