About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Policy Proposals
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
green dot Current Policy Proposals
green dot Archived Policy Proposals
green dot Subscribe to the Policy-Announce List
green dot Policy Proposal Template
green dot Policy Development Process Info (PDF)
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-06

Number:
2007-06
Policy Proposal Name:

Global Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address Space

Authors:
spacer

Roque Gagliano

Co-authors: Francisco Obispo - CENIT
Hytham EL Nakhal - MCIT
Didier Allain Kla - ISOC Cote d'Ivoire
Proposal Version:
1.0
Submission Date:
30 July 2007
Latest Status:
Withdrawn after Discussion phase (ended on 27 August 2007)
Authors decided that they want to make a new proposal (see 2008-03)
Suggested WG for Discussion and Publication:
Address Policy
Proposal Type:
New
Policy Term:
Permanent
Policy Document to be Affected:
n/a
Summary of Proposal:

This policy describes the process for the allocation of the remaining IPv4 space from IANA to the RIRs. When a minimum amount of available space is reached, an identical number of IPv4 allocation units (/8s) will be allocated from IANA to each RIR, replacing the current IPv4 allocation policy.

 

Draft Policy Text

New Text

In order to fulfil the requirements of this policy, at the time it is adopted, an identical number of IPv4 allocation units (N units) will be reserved by IANA for each RIR. The number N is defined as: 5. The reserved allocation units will no longer be part of the available space at the IANA pool. The process for the allocation of the remaining IPv4 space is divided in two consecutive phases:

1. Existing Policy Phase:

During this phase IANA will continue allocating IPv4 addresses to the RIRs using the existing allocation policy. This phase will continue until a request for IPv4 address space from any RIR to IANA cannot be fulfilled with the remaining IPv4 space available at the IANA pool.

This will be the last IPv4 address space request that IANA will accept from any RIR. At this point the next phase of the process will be initiated.

2. Exhaustion Phase:

IANA will automatically allocate the reserved IPv4 allocation units to each RIR (N units to each one) and respond to the last request with the remaining available allocation units at the IANA pool (M units).

2.1. Size of the final IPv4 allocations:

During this phase IANA will automatically allocate N allocation units to each RIR from the reserved space defined in this policy. IANA will also allocate M allocation units to the RIR that submitted the last request for IPv4 addresses.

2.2. Allocation of the remaining IPv4 Address space:

After the completion of the evaluation of the final request for IPv4 addresses, IANA must:

  • Immediately notify the NRO about the activation of the second phase of this policy
  • Proceed to allocate M allocation units to the RIR that submitted the last request for IPv4 address space
  • Proceed to allocate N allocation units to each RIR from the reserved space

Rationale:

Arguments Supporting the Proposal

The IANA pool of allocation units of IPv4 addresses (/8s) is decreasing rapidly. A new policy is proposed to replace the current 'on demand' policy in order to bring certainty on how the remaining space will be allocated. This policy eliminates the pressure on the remaining central pool of addresses by allocating equal amount of allocation units (N) to each RIR.

RIRs may be studying slow-landing policies or the possibility to reserve specific address spaces for 'critical infrastructure' or new companies in order to comply with anti-trust regulations in its region. This policy allows each RIR to adopt those policies through its PDP, which is simpler than a global policy discussion process. Each RIR will have the exact information on the amount of address spaces that they will be receiving as a last allocation from the IANA.

The policy is written in such a way that the discussion could be split in two sections: first do we agree on the concept of the policy and second what is the appropriate value for the last allocation units N.


Arguments Opposing the Proposal

Concerns have been raised regarding the address blocks that will be kept at smaller RIRs (particularly LACNIC and AfriNIC) however, at the actual address consumption rate, to open those blocks (10 x /8) would only represent a twelve month extension from the exhaustion date for the bigger RIRs.

 



 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community