About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard

  • To:
  • From: Mark Prior < >
  • Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:39:43 +0930
  • Cc: Pekka Savola < >

Curtis Villamizar wrote:

Any AS object that provides policy already has many import and export
statements.  Today IPv4 and IPv6 policy does not match so different
statements are needed anyway.  For example, AS3561 has 737 import
statements and 738 export statements.  I would venture to guess their
IPv6 policy is a lot simpler.

My high level policy (ignoring encoding it in some language) is likely to be the same irrespective of whether it is IPv4 or IPv6. My _application_ of that policy to a peer may be different, ie if the peer doesn't speak IPv4 there would be no need to include any IPv4 components.

Mark.





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community