About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: initial draft to bootstrap some discussions

  • To: Florent Parent < >
  • From: Mark Prior < >
  • Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:54:26 +0930

I think that you don't need to introduce new attributes (import6, export6) to the autnum object to support IPv6 as there is an existing mechanism which is probably only currently used to inject static routes into BGP.

You can just overload the protocol mechanism, ie

import: [protocol <protocol1>] [into <protocol2>]
<import-expression>

so if you wanted to just specify a rule for IPv6 you could say

import: protocol IPv6
from AS2764
accept { 2001:210::/35 }

omitting the protocol clause would imply any protocol and if you wanted it to just apply to IPv4 you would use "protocol IPv4".

Also I'm not sure you need to go into what defines an address prefix range as it is just the same as for IPv4. All you really need to say is the same constructs apply to IPv6 as well as IPv4. If you spell it out for IPv6 then you run the risk of getting out of sync with the base document.

Mark.
--




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community