Re: RPSLng task force outline

[Cengiz Alaettinoglu <]

On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 02:47, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> Florent Parent wrote:
> > 
> > (same email, but with a subject ;-)
> > 
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > First, thanks for joining in for this new RIPE task force.
> > 
> > Here's a first cut at the work ahead of us. Thanks to Joachim for
> > providing the outline done some time ago. Much of the following is based
> > on that.
> > 
> > Please, take a look at the following task force TODO list and send
> > comments/additions to the list. We need to properly define the scope of
> > our work.
> >
> 
> Thank you Florent for doing this. 
> 
> Starting this discussion I think we aim at making modifications to RPSL
> (RPS-auth?) spec. I am not sure that the guidelines for RPSL
> extensibility outlined in section 10 of RFC2622 are clear enough and
> don't require more consideration as we move forward.

The section titled
	RPSL Names, Reserved Words, and Representation
needs the core of the work. I think the other stuff would fall in place
easier by following section 10.

> 
> Therefor I would like to know your opinion whether this forum is the
> right place to conduct this kind of discussion.
>  
> > Thanks
> > Florent.
> > 
> [...]
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Andrei Robachevsky
> RIPE NCC
>