|
|
 |
Re: RPSLng task force outline
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 20:49:03 +0930
At 4:23 AM -0400 5/10/01, Florent Parent wrote:
Please, take a look at the following task force TODO list and send
comments/additions to the list. We need to properly define the scope of
our work.
I think that if we are going to open Pandora's Box and start fiddling
with RPSL then I would like us to consider revisiting what I consider
is a defect in RFC 2622!
There isn't currently an iterator in RPSL and I think it would be
helpful if there was one. Maybe Cengiz can explain why it was
rejected last time but I will illustrate how I would use it if there
was one :-)
While working for Connect I created a large number of AS set objects
that listed our customer's AS, their customers, etc. If I was a peer
of Connect and wanted to filter them via AS paths (or just wanted to
get my policy correct :-) I would like to use these sets rather than
reinvent them but there is no easy way to do that.
Connect (AS2764) has an AS set called AS2764:AS-TRANSIT that includes
a list of ASes that provide transit to other ASes and then for each
AS in that set there is another set called AS2764:AS-CUSTOMERS:ASx
(where ASx is that member AS).
As a peer I could use these AS2764:AS-CUSTOMERS:ASx objects but there
is no mechanism to use AS2764:AS-TRANSIT to iterate through them so
my policy would need to explicitly name them all and somehow keep
them up to date. What would be better is something like
import: from AS2764
accept interate over AS2764:AS-TRANSIT for
<^AS2764+ TheAS+ AS2764:AS-CUSTOMERS:TheAS*$>
Mark.
--
|
|
 |
 |