[routing-wg]Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
-
To: "Nick Hilliard" nick@localhost
-
From: "Rob Evans" internetplumber@localhost
-
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:43:37 +0100
-
Cc: address-policy-wg@localhost, routing-wg@localhost, db-wg@localhost
-
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Zg2n2x3XlR75Jb8qkRteJizMtnC1TYoT6IrOTTxQEMw=; b=TsZ9JVYn/0DFG4feYmhbqkK427IhupscjgBb/xqnBBZ1RXRy7uctJ9T6JQM02HTzfx 4YZKJyJWfX+c7TUoeBx2kNqybEsUYifFF6As3mw/nHnMV7AwKOciI2oVPtg/8eflDp+P nsY9OquAg0StnRAzeLneXUdkW3JROpT9EEVxs=
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=cRHYfsDkgIZVCmen3ULEKLVJKa4iAZEnIOkOR0XKtwZYCPUWi6HZIXAUR3WVDrelvI yw3IHTxgNiPrECLEtDxrdqtqWps+n1dYd+qcwtK65piaVg/5KxwHrkLwBtp6KU/o2Eft l37bsusLnazdPjuU2nJJOwh/WR9Y6ZAi316J0=
Hi Nick,
> - "ASDOT is more easily remembered"
>
> For the foreseeable future, after the first 10k assignments of ASN32s in a
> particular 16 bit ASN block range (e.g. AS3.x), both ASDOT and ASPLAIN
> formats will be represented using similar numbers of digits.
I agree, both with your sentiment and the proposal, but the "more
easily remembered" tag is a bit more than irrelevant. Whilst the
low-order 16 bits might not be memorable, it might be quite easy to
keep up with which registries have used which upper 16 bits for a
little while, so manual 'whois' queries can be directed to the
appropriate server.
Cheers,
Rob
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
