Re: [routing-wg]Four byte ASN notation
-
To: paul@localhost
-
From: Gert Doering gert@localhost
-
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:18:36 +0100
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=GX6u86kSoOkHFAsrKc8UakRXbCzaLZEUnv/EMVacIYCaRiLXvUOpovkjPt0hQxEH ;
-
Resent-date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:18:56 +0100
-
Resent-from: gert@localhost
-
Resent-message-id: <20071210141856.88936.qmail@localhost
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 04:17:54PM +0000, Paul Jakma wrote:
> That seems to have beeen the only meaningful pro/con, given that both
> operator and vendor opinion in other forums has largely been against,
> but yet this unmandated proposal still was implemented.
I can't see any evidence for "operator .. opinion ... has been largely
against" from the discussion in the RIPE routing WG. Some operators had
concerns, others have been very much in favour of asdot.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 110584
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
