Re: [routing-wg]Four byte ASN notation

[Paul Jakma paul@localhost]

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:

> I fully agree for the real world.  Here it seems that RIRs and some of
> the vendors use asdot(+), so a safe bet would be to use that.
You've left out the operators, *all* of whom are going to audit all 
their all their configuration state and update any string-form 
filters of ASNs. There's no point revisting the arguments though, so 
let's try avoid classifications like the above.
A decision would indeed be nice. Given "asdot" is a fait accompli, by 
way of unmandated implementation, and there's little will to turn 
this barge back to port, why not write up and approve whatever policy 
documents are required?
regards,
--
Paul Jakma	paul@localhost	paul@localhost	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
I don't know who my grandfather was; I am much more concerned to know
what his grandson will be.
		-- Abraham Lincoln